I'm sure this response from Gary Andrus on scoring dual track meets with 5-3-1 or 3-2-1 will enlighten many of our readers and stir up the cobwebs in the brains of the rest. Ned, do you remember Gary? Did he pass your course? I'm reading this as a student who squeezed through my only undergrad math class with a D. However on the broader spectrum that same semester I also got a D in ROTC, although I did learn to use a compass and read a map. But militarily I placed my machine guns in the wrong positions. George
Beginning our 14th year and 1,200+ postings. A blog for athletes and fans of 20th century Track and Field culled from articles in sports journals of the day, original articles, book reviews, and commentaries from readers who lived and ran and coached in that era. We're equivalent to an Amer. Legion post of Track and Field but without cheap beer. You may contact us directly at irathermediate@gmail.com or write a comment below. George Brose, Courtenay, BC ed.
Once Upon a Time in the Vest
Friday, April 15, 2022
V 12 N. 31 A Response to Scoring Dual Meets With 5-3-1 or 3-2-1 Systems
Hi George, Gary Andrus here.
Love the site, thanks for your fine work.
Back in the late 60's/early 70's Ned Price was a professor in the
math department at Wayne State University in Detroit. At that
time I was a Ph.D. student in math at Wayne. Ned and I frequently
went on training runs together. I can still smell the fumes from
the beer distillery we often ran by on our way down to Cobo Hall.
Anyway, regarding your recent post in which Ned gives a case of
a duel meet where one team loses using a 5-3-1 system of
scoring, but wins using a 3-2-1 system. To expand on Ned's result,
(given 10 events, no relays) there are a total of 10 cases in which
that phenomenon exists. I wrote a simple Java program to
compute the cases.
x = number of first places for Team A
y = number of second places for Team A
z = number of third places for Team Ax = 1 y = 9 z = 10
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 42
Team B: 48
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 1 y = 10 z = 8
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 43
Team B: 47
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 1 y = 10 z = 9
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 44
Team B: 46
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 32
Team B: 28
Team A wins
x = 2 y = 8 z = 9
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 43
Team B: 47
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 2 y = 8 z = 10
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 44
Team B: 46
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 32
Team B: 28
Team A wins
x = 2 y = 9 z = 7
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 44
Team B: 46
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 3 y = 6 z = 10
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 43
Team B: 47
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 3 y = 7 z = 8
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 44
Team B: 46
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 4 y = 5 z = 9
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 44
Team B: 46
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
x = 5 y = 3 z = 10
Scoring under 5-3-1
Team A: 44
Team B: 46
Team B wins
Scoring under 3-2-1
Team A: 31
Team B: 29
Team A wins
Total cases = 10
I might as well throw in my source code too. It's not the most
efficient algorithm, but the numbers are small so, execution-wise,
it doesn't make much difference. Also, one can imagine many
generalizations. Maybe your readers would like to work on some.
/**
* A dual track meet between Team A and Team B. 10 events.
* x = number of first places for Team A
* y = number of second places for Team A
* z = number of third places for Team A
*
* Gary Andrus
* Version 1.0, Date 4/14/2022
**/
public class TrackScore
{
/**
* Output: All possibilities with Team B winning under the 5-3-1
* system of scoring but losing under the 3-2-1 system.
**/
public static void main (String[] args)
{
// points for first, second, and third for two scoring methods
int f1 = 5, s1 = 3, t1 = 1;
int f2 = 3, s2 = 2, t2 = 1;
int x, y, z;
int count = 0;
for (x=0; x<=8; x++)
for (y=0; y<=10;y++)
for (z=0; z<=10; z++)
{
int a = f1*x + s1*y + t1*z; // Team A points under 5-3-1
int b = 90 - a; // Team B points under 5-3-1
int aa = f2*x + s2*y + t2*z; // Team A points under 3-2-1
int bb = 60 - aa; // Team B points under 3-2-1
if (a < 45)
{
if (aa > 30)
{
System.out.println ();
System.out.println ("x = " + x + " y = " + y + " z = " + z);
System.out.println
("Scoring under " + f1 +"-" + s1 +"-" + t1);
System.out.println ("Team A: " + a);
System.out.println ("Team B: " + b);
System.out.println ("Team B wins");
System.out.println ();
System.out.println
("Scoring under " + f2 +"-" + s2 +"-" + t2);
System.out.println ("Team A: " + aa);
System.out.println ("Team B: " + bb);
System.out.println ("Team A wins");
count++;
}
}
}
System.out.println ();
System.out.println ("Total cases = " + count);
}
}
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
V 14 N. 71 Dallas Long R.I.P. 1940-2024
Dallas Long ( from USC Athletics ) D...
-
In the April 1962 posting that covered some of the big Relays meets, there was mention of a remarkable performance by Jerry Dyes of...
-
Jerry Siebert leading Peter Snell in an Olympic Prelim 1964 We received a note from Walt Murphy this morning that Jerry Siebert, one of ...
1 comment:
Gary Andrus is a genius and is also a very kind human being!
Post a Comment