Once Upon a Time in the Vest

Friday, March 31, 2023

V 13 N. 33 A Pole Vaulting Story from Princeton

 The following article on Princeton University's website was written by Jerry Price.  Photography by Seth James.  It appeared two weeks before the NCAA indoor meet at Albequerque where Sondre Guttormsen won the pole vault at 19' 8 1/4 ".     Sondre's brother Simen was injured and could not compete.    Video:   Sondre Jumping at Harvard 19' 2"


Seth James Photography

Men's Track and Field March 09, 2023

Feature Story: The Guttormsen Brothers And The Crazy Event They've Mastered

Sondre (left) and Simen Guttormsen

Stavhopp er den tøffeste øvelsen i friidrett.” — Fred Samara

THEY LAUGH THEY ALL LAUGH.

 The brothers. The father. The coach. 

What is it about this endeavor — one that makes you part sprinter, part gymnast, part physicist, 

part astronaut — that brings that sort of universal reaction? They’ve all tried it. They’ve all excelled at it. 


Their laughter is their badge of honor. It’s their way of acknowledging the absurdity of the task, 

the courage required to try it in the first place, the skill needed to master it. 

That’s why they all laugh at the simple question asked of them: What is it about the pole vault?

Sondre Guttormsen

THERE ARE FIVE INSCRIPTIONS of the name “GórmR” that have been found in the ruins dating 

to Norway’s Viking Age, which means 1,500 or so years ago. Eventually, that short form evolved into 

“Guttorm,” an Old Norse word that meant “spare” or “honor.” At some point, Norwegian names adopted 

the Icelandic custom of adding “sen” to the end of the last name, meaning “Son of,” which in this case 

turned “Guttorm” into “Guttormsen.”

“Everyone in Norway can trace their lineage back to at least 1200,” Atle Guttormsen says from his 

home in Ski, a small city just outside of Oslo. “I know names of our family from the 1600s.” 

Atle is a professor of economics at the Norwegian University for Life Sciences and a former 

Norwegian national-level track athlete who tried the pole vault but ended up being a better hurdler. 

The latest generation of the Sons of Guttorm — his sons? They’re another story.

They are pole vaulters, through and through. Sondre and Simen, both Princeton seniors, are among 

the very best in the event, in the NCAA, and in the world. Sondre is a two-time NCAA champion who 

will chase another indoor title this weekend in Albuquerque. Simen finished fourth indoors and outdoors 

last year and would have been a potential top-two finisher this weekend were he not nursing an injury.

Sondre, the Norwegian record holder in the event, competed at the 2021 Olympics in Tokyo. He’s also 

in the top five in the world indoors this winter. Sondre and Simen are both members of the Norwegian 

team for this summer’s World Championships and are both almost certainties for the Olympics in Paris in 2024. 

Sondre is the older of the two, 18 months older, in fact. Their looks are classically Scandinavian, with 

blonde hair and blue eyes. They speak with slightly discernable accents, the result of all of their time 

spent in the United States.

The brothers have been their own best influences. They’ve encouraged each other, coached each 

other, pushed each other, taught each other supported each other — even fought with each other, 

though “not too much. You know. Like brothers do,” Sondre says.

“They’re different, but they’re the same,” their father says. “To outsiders, Simen might seem like more 

of an introvert. Maybe he waits a little longer to say what he’s thinking. Sondre is a classic extrovert. 

He tells you right away what’s on his mind. Simen is more of a computer science, math, physics guy 

than Sondre, but they’re both really smart. They go to Princeton, right?”

Yes, they do, which is nearly 4,000 miles away from their hometown. They grew up in Ski, which

seems like the perfect name for a Norwegian town, until you realize that it’s pronounced “She” and 

not like the winter sport that so many there do. 

“Every family in Norway goes on ski trips,” Simen says.

His father is right. Upon meeting the brothers for the first time, Simen does come across as the 

quieter of the two. Sondre is louder and talks faster. Both laugh easily. Both speak humbly about 

their accomplishments.  There is a strong brotherly connection between them, to be sure. It’s 

impossible to miss. As they talk about their upbringing, their introduction to sports, their experiences 

in the United States, they often talk on top of each other and often make fun of the other. When they 

can’t remember exact facts and dates, or when they disagree, they shift from English to Norwegian to

 get clarity and then back to English to present the correct answer. 

If you didn’t know what their sport was and saw them only in their “Princeton Athletics” gear, your 

first thought wouldn’t necessarily be track and field. Simen looks like an outfielder or a three-point 

shooter. Sondre looks like a linebacker. As adults, they look like they could literally play anything they 

wanted to; as kids, they did, including skiing, European handball, soccer, hockey, basketball and gymnastics. 

They grew up 100 meters away from a track at a local school, and at first they were sprinters and hurdlers. 

With their all-around athleticism, they could have been decathletes. Instead, they took to the pole vault 

very early.

Guttormsens
The Guttormsens: Sebastian, Sara, Atle, Sondre, Simen, Kristin
"YOU NEED TO BE A LOT OF THINGS to be a great pole vaulter,” says Princeton head track and 
field coach Fred Samara, a 1976 Olympian as a decathlete and someone who knows pretty much 
everything there is to know about the event, “but more than anything else, you need to be one thing. 
Fearless.”

The pole vault looks so effortless when done the way the Guttormsens can do it that it’s 

easy to forget just what goes into it. As track and field events go, it’s unique. Actually, as 

far as anything else in any sport goes, it’s unique.

It’s the only event in track and field that requires an instrument to assist the athlete in the 

event.   Every other event is about how fast you can run, how far you can throw something 

or how high you can jump over something on your own accord. It’s just you and the event. 

The pole vault is a whole different animal. Hey, what other sporting endeavor has this on its 

Wikipedia page:

“Speed is an essential element to high vaults. The horizontal kinetic energy produced by the 

run (Ek=1/2mv(squared)) is converted to vertical propulsion (Ep=mgh). Assuming no loss of 

energy (Ek=Ep), this means that h=v(squared)/2g.” Yes, this is clearly a different animal than, 

say, “On your mark, get set, go.”

“In other words, the vaulter’s potential height is not linearly related to their runway velocity,

but is actually a function of the square of the velocity,” says August Kiles.

If anyone knows about the pole vault and the science behind it, that would be August Kiles, 

Class of 2018 and an an elite vaulter himself during his time at Princeton, during which he 

won his own Heps titles, set the records that Sondre broke, was a team captain and an 

operations research and financial engineering major. 

“The faster the vaulter is, the greater their potential to jump high,” he says. "It’s a super 

complicated motion, and there are many, many other variables in play, but make no 

mistake—in pole vault, speed is king.”

So you have physics. And sprinting. What else? 

“When someone would tell me they were a pole vaulter,” says Princeton’s former women’s 

coach Peter Farrell, “my response would always be the same. I’d say “Yeah? What kind of 

gymnast are you?’”

It’s gymnastics to be sure. It’s also way more than that. 

Competitive pole vaulting dates back to the early 19th century. At first, there were more 

competitions to see how far a vaulter could launch himself, as opposed to how high he could 

go. There are still a handful of those events to this day. 

As for the pole itself, it can be anywhere from 13 to 17 feet long, with a two-inch diameter. 

Poles today are made from highly flexible composite materials, largely fiberglass, as 

opposed to the wooden poles that were originally used. 

“The pole is not particularly heavy,” Samara says. “Maybe 10 pounds or so. But it gets heavy 

when you hold it near the top. Then it can really feel heavy.”

Each jump starts with a sprint, with the pole obviously, of about 50 yards, before the pole is 

planted in the box. 

“All of the vaulter’s speed from the run is absorbed into the pole at takeoff," Kiles says. "We 

call this ‘loading the pole.’ Then the vaulter swings upside down and is launched vertically, 

reclaiming the energy they generated, and clearing the bar if all goes well. It’s one thing to 

run fast with a pole in your hands; it’s a whole different thing to take that speed and transfer 

it efficiently into height. And that’s really what sets great vaulters like Sondre and Simen apart.”

As the vaulter leaves the ground, he or she kicks the feet upward, pulling the knees to the 

chest while the back is parallel to the ground. Think about just that part of it. You’ve just 

sprinted 50 or so yards, and now you’re being propelled upwards. You’re essentially lying 

on your back, only you’re elevated. All that is holding you up is the pole. 

In the next millisecond, the vaulter needs to begin to straighten out, until the legs are straight 

up in the air and the head is upside-down. The body is now a straight line, upside down, 

holding the top of the flexed pole that is now U-shaped, one end planted in the box, and the 

other end gripped tightly by the vaulter with both hands. 

As vaulters are flipping upside down, they push — or “row” — the pole over to the opposite 

side of the body than the side they carried it during the sprint. Then, once they have launched

themselves upward in the air and flipped upside down, they do a half-twist, like a diver. As 

the feet and legs begin to rise above the bar, the vaulters bend at the hips to drop their feet 

down over the bar as they throw the pole backward toward the runway and then snap the 

torso, arms, and head backward to clear the bar. 

“The better you get, the further away from the box you are when you plant the pole,” Samara 

says. “Sondre is 14 or 15 feet from the box. You have to travel all that distance holding onto 

the pole before you get to the bar.”

What’s that like? 

“It’s like you’re in space,” Samara says. “It’s very scary until you get used to it.”

Of course, if you’ve managed to do all that, there’s the slight matter of the drop, which takes 

you down from above the bar (hopefully) into a pit of three feet of foam that awaits you about 

two stories down. 

“That’s the easy part,” Samara says. “Really, it’s all physics. The speed of the takeoff. The 

angle of the takeoff. The pole has to move to vertical. The pole has to work as a pendulum. 

If you do it right, it’s a pretty effortless looking thing.”

So what is it all like? What are they feeling as they’re clearing the bar and landing? What do 

they see?
 

“It’s over in a blink,” Sondre says. “You put the pole in the box, and then I don’t even know 

what’s happening. You don’t really remember seeing anything. There’s just a lot  of adrenaline. 

You’re flying the air.”

Like all elite vaulters, they’ve practiced every element over and over and over, until it’s second 

nature. They make adjustments here and there to every facet, large and small. When it comes 

to the actual competition, the actual act of going from the ground to the bar and back down, you 

might think time slows down a bit, but it doesn’t.

“It happens so fast that there are limited things to think about,” Simen says. “You can’t go through

the steps in your head while you’re doing it. You just have to have it be automated.”

It wasn’t always that way. 

MTrack

WHEN YOU THINK OF NORWAY, you think of the outdoors. You think of Vikings and skiing 

and snow. You think of the natural beauty, particularly the Fjords, the mountain-enclosed bodies 

of water that are simply stunning. The Guttormsen family has a boat that they’d take out into the 

North Sea each summer. 

“My favorite thing about Norway is the long summer nights,” Sondre says. “The sun is out all 

night, and you can be with your friends on the beautiful beaches or by the unique rock formations

 by the ocean. That’s called ‘svaberg’ in Norwegian. The water there can warm up o 78 degree

 Fahrenheit.”

There’s something else about the country he loves. 

“I also have to say that my favorite thing about Norway is that my family is there.”

The Guttormsens have been there for centuries. Almost every branch in the family tree is 100 

percent Norwegian, with just a little German mixed in. 

Atle grew up in Ski as well. His athletic career ended on the national level, and he became a 

college professor. His work is in economics, and specifically in agriculture and fisheries. 

“Salmon farming is big business here,” he says. “I teach economics and finance, but much of 

my research has been related to fish. My university had been an agricultural university, but they 

added a business school. That’s how it started for me.” 

The boys were young when Atle introduced them to the pole vault. How young?

Sondre: “We were 8 and 7.”

Simen: “No, 5 and 4.”

Sondre: “That young?”

Then they speak in Norwegian for a second.

Sondre: “However old we were, we must have thought it was fun, because we kept doing it.”

At first, Atle would have the boys climb a ladder and then hold onto the pole, which he would 

carry to the pit. 

“That way, we got the feeling of being up in the air without having to be any good at it,” Sondre 

says. 

“They tried all kinds of events in track when they were young,” Atle says. “I thought it would be 

fun for them to try the pole vault, and they had fun with it.”

Guttormsens

THEIR BIG BREAKTHROUGH CAME when Atle was on a sabbatical at UC-Davis in 2010. 

“They had just started a track club there that was associated with the high school,” Atle says. “I 

told them that I had an 11 year old and nine year old. The head coach said we could join them. 

There were 200 kids on the track team. It was at Davis Senior High. They were 11 and nine, and 

they got to train the whole season. When we got back to Norway the next year, the pole vault 

was their event.”

The boys began to show steady improvement, improving by more than a foot each year, going 

from being able to clear eight feet all the way up to 17 or 18 feet. Sondre improved from 17-9 to 

18-10 in one year, between 2017 and 2018, and he would finish sixth at both the European and 

World Junior Championships. 

When it came time to go to college, they both wanted to come to the United States to compete. 

Sondre considered Harvard but instead went to UCLA, mostly because he loved the idea of 

being in California. While at UCLA he battled injuries but still managed to earn second-team 

All-American honors indoors (finishing ninth) and outdoors (finishing 10th) while setting the 

UCLA indoor record of 18-9.5 in 2019 , his only year competing.

Simen, in the meantime, graduated high school a year early and then took classes at a Norwegian 

university for a year before thinking about his opportunities in the U.S., where he was looking for

 the best academic challenge he could find. An operations research and financial engineering 

major, he reached out to Princeton and Cornell and chose Princeton. He came to college as a 

very good, but not yet elite, vaulter. 

“He was 5-0, 100 pounds,” Sondre says, in that way that brothers talk to each other, with the 

actual numbers probably a little higher, though not much. 

With Simen at Princeton, Sondre soured on his UCLA experience. He reached out about 

transferring, and he became one of the 13 transfer students the University accepted that year. 

Not transfer athletes. Total transfers.

“It’s the best decision I’ve made,” Sondre says.

“One day, Simen came to practice and asked if his brother could transfer to Princeton,” Samara 

says. “I told him that I didn’t think so, but I went to the administration. The most difficult thing 

was that he had to repeat his sophomore year, but that wasn’t that big a deal, since they wanted 

to be in the same class anyway.”

Sondre went through the process and was accepted. His first year was 2020-21, which he did 

remotely from Norway. He wouldn’t compete on the NCAA level for two years, but he did qualify 

for the Norwegian Olympic team and did get to compete in Tokyo, where he unfortunately suffered 

a quad pull on his first attempt.

“I had a really good prep for it,” Sondre says. “I was doing well in practice. I jumped 5.70 meteres

 in training in both Norway and Japan [that mark would have qualified him for the Olympic final. 

The whole experience wasn’t what people would expect. I spent nine days in a hotel with my 

father and a few Norwegian athletes. It was isolating. People were tested for Covid every day, 

and everyone was scared of testing positive. Then I got hurt. Still, it was my first Olympic 

experience, which is special.”

He would finally arrive on campus for the 2021-22 academic year and join Samara’s team, 

which was quite likely the greatest Ivy League track and field team ever put together. How 

would Sondre adjust and fit in?

“I had observed him compete on TV and nationally a few times,” Samara says. “I observed that 

he was always putting tremendous pressure on himself, and he was always getting hurt. I could 

see he’d lost a lot of the joy of competing. The first week of school, I sat him down and told him 

two things. First, he had to stay healthy. Second, he had to have fun. He had to enjoy track and 

field. From that point, his personality changed. He’s just a great team guy. He loves being on the 

team, loves being at Princeton. He roots for the other guys. He helps them however he can. 

He's been awesome.”

“Everything has been amazing,” Sondre says. “The team. The coaches. I never realized the Ivy 

League would have that good of a team with athletes who are serious as we have. We have a 

lot of athletes with Olympic dreams. It’s been great to be around this environment with similar-minded

people.” 

Simen’s international career began with the European U-18 championships in Hungary in 2018, 

and he also has won Norwegian U-18 and U-20 championships. The start of his Princeton career 

was not as auspicious, beginning with the cancellation of the 2020 NCAA championships and 

then no competition the following school year. 

The brothers were finally teammates a year ago, and the results were special. Sondre won the 

NCAA title both indoors and outdoors, while Simen finished fourth both times. Together, they 

were part of a team that finished fifth indoors and seventh outdoors, shockingly amazing finishes 

for an Ivy League school that saw Princeton finish ahead of traditional powers like Oregon, 

Stanford and Arkansas, among others. 

They are already the two best pole vaulters in Ivy League history. Princeton crushed the field at 

the Ivy League Heptagonal championships indoors and outdoors a year ago and won indoors 

again two weeks ago at Dartmouth, where Sondre again won the pole vault. Simen missed the 

meet with an injury, the same injury that will keep him sidelined in Albuquerque.

Sondre, in fact, didn’t attempt a jump at Heps until every other vaulter was finished. Then he 

calmly cleared the bar to take the win and then raised the bar seven more inches, clearing that. 

In between the trip to Hanover and the trip to Albuquerque, Sondre also made a quick trip over 

to Instanbul, competing in the European indoor championships, which he won with a vault of 5-8 

(19 feet). He is ranked among the top vaulters in the world right now.

“He’s a legitimate medal threat at the Olympics,” Samara says. 

First, there is the NCAA meet this weekend and then the outdoor season. The brothers will be teammates again next year, though not at Princeton. Instead, they’ll compete as grad transfers 

at Texas, where Simen will again study ORFE and Sondre, a psych major, will study sports management. 

Their career goals? They have them, but they’re on hold for a while. The Olympics are their 

immediate postgraduate goal.

Sondre Guttormsen

Sondre and Simen have been talking for about 30 minutes now when Sondre lets slip a fact that 

to this point has not been mentioned. Atle has taken numerous sabbaticals to UC-Davis, and 

Sondre’s mother Kristin actually gave birth to him in California, giving him duel citizenship and 

checking off at least one potentially important box, in the event it ever comes to that.

“Hey, that means you could technically be the President of the United States,” Sondre is told.

He laughs at this. Then he looks at Simen, who was born in Norway.

“You can’t,” he says. 

Then he laughs. It’s the laugh one brother uses when he’s busting on another brother. It’s a 

playful laugh, a laugh that is part of their familial glue.

It’s a different laugh than he used, that they all used, when they first were asked about the pole 

vault. That one was a merit badge of a laugh. That one came from conquering the fear of 

launching yourself seemingly into outer space, powered only by the physics of the pole itself. 

There’s a different laugh that the event elicits. This one comes from John Mack, the Ford Family 

Director of Athletics at Princeton and himself a 10-time Heptagonal sprint champion when he 

was at Princeton. When he hears Samara speak, he asks what the subject is. The pole vault, 

he’s told.

“Have you ever tried it?” he’s asked.

That’s when he gives off the other kind of laugh. It’s the one that says “no way, not me, no 

chance.”

“Stavhopp er den tøffeste øvelsen i friidrett,” Samara says. 

Of course, Samara actually said it in English. The brothers translated it into Norwegian. 

What does that mean? 

It means “The pole vault is the most difficult event in track and field.”

No matter how easy the Guttormsen brothers make it look. 

— by Jerry Price


Monday, March 27, 2023

V 13 N. 32 "Fifty Years A Runner" by William Blewett, Reviewed by Paul O'Shea



                                                 Pursued Sub-Four, Rewarded With Fifty

                                                      A Book Review by Paul O’Shea

                                                              Fifty Years A Runner,

                                                My Unlikely Pursuit of a Sub-4 Mile

                                                    And Life As a Runner Thereafter

                                                          By William Blewett

                                                     Amazon, 181 pages, $14.95

     No, not another logbook regurgitation, I grumbled before reviewing William Blewett’s new

book. Not another vanity entry in the personal history genre.  I had false started.


     Fifty Years A Runner is the compelling saga of an athlete who pursued a sub-four minute mile

with remarkable intensity. William Blewett tells us where he’s been and how his career might

inform other distance runners. His book is catnip for running historians, coaches, and younger

runners. It deserves wide readership.

     Blewett began his career in Lawton, Oklahoma, as an unprepossessing high school miler.  Later, at

 the University of Oklahoma, he ran under the tutelage of Pan Am decathlon gold medalist and

successful coach J.D. Martin to whom the book is dedicated.  “He accepted me as a freshman

walk-on even though I had never bettered five minutes in the mile…and I, thanks to his patient

coaching, became the runner I dreamt of becoming.”

                                                   

                                                                         J.D. Martin

     A student of the history and physiology of distance running, Blewett saw that it took Bannister

seven years to make history, after the Englishman first broke five minutes. “Seven years to

reach my goal seemed about right,” Blewett said. But his plan was upended by overtraining

and injuries. William Blewett never did break four minutes. His best was 4:02.1. But he did run

for decades until injuries took their toll.

     His time at the University was accomplished, but unfulfilling. Often, competing in the Big Eight

conference he admired Jim Ryun’s high kicking strides.  

                                          Bill Blewett on inside lane next to you know who.

                                           End of first lap of the Big 8 mile in Norman, OK


     The 1966 indoor frosh mile in Kansas City brought him to a starting line with the Kansas

unicorn. “I rationalized that Ryun and I were not actually racing against each other. I had

merely shared the track with him, as a golf cart might share a four-lane highway.” Blewett was

lapped on the twelve-laps-to-the-mile track, but did not impede the Jayhawk, to the

appreciation of ten thousand spectators.

     Nothing succeeds like excess the Sooner believed, so he increased his mileage in summer

training. Before his first collegiate season he ran 900 miles. Prior to his sophomore year his

body odometer read 1,220 miles. His higher mileage mitigation solution allowed a rest day each

week, but to compensate he increased the intensity on the training days. That spring his time

fell to 4:11.8.

     In l968 he was recording vigorous interval workouts, with a 17-mile “recovery” day. 

The Achilles tendon pain would last for two decades.

     Not satisfied with chasing Bannister, Blewett was drawn by the novice marathoner Emil

Zatopek’s Olympic victory in l952. There were no entry standards to enter the 1968 U.S Olympic

Marathon trials. Because the Games were at Mexico City’s 7,382 foot elevation, the race was

held at Alamosa, Colorado’s 7,544 feet. Despite starting slowly, he nevertheless had little to

offer in the latter stages and finished 26th in 2:53.46.

     In another road race outing he won the l973 Peachtree ten thousand in 31:22.

     In 1970 he ran an invitational mile at the Houston Astrodome, with heats in the afternoon and

the final at ten that night. Blewett ran fifth to Marty Liquori in 4:07.2. In l971 the author ran

what would then be a mile personal best at the Kansas Relays, 4:04.8. Ryun broke the tape nine

seconds earlier.

     Like a kid in a candy shop, William’s running history is one of over training, under resting, and

ignoring the consequences to his body.

     There were cherished times when he ran like the wind.   He called it “running like a deer,” what 

cyclists call functional threshold power, or performing at peak level. He reached this level only about a 

dozen times in his career. At other times he resembled a Zamboni.

     Doubling at the Drake Relays (probably taking one for the team), an hour after running 4:09.5 in

the relay, he was introduced to steeplechase barriers. He placed next to last in 9:58.7, sixty-two

seconds behind the winner. “What my freestyle hurdling technique produced was the

juxtaposition of two incongruous sights: a pack of 18 runners flowing smoothly over the barrier

like a slinky on a staircase followed by a lone runner, me, cautiously mounting and dismounting

with full crotch contact.” Eighteen thousand spectators were amused as they cheered what

would be his only steeplechase.

     Blewett received an undergraduate degree from the University of Oklahoma and a graduate

degree in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University.  In his professional career he was a

senior research scientist and mechanical engineer. For more than forty years he also has been a

free-lance writer. In addition to Fifty Years A Runner, he wrote The Art of the Fastball, published

in 2013.

     Of particular interest to readers of this website, Blewett and George Brose, the Vest’s publisher,

were University of Oklahoma runners and seeking the elusive sub-four minute mile. When

Blewett first entered the OU fieldhouse, his attention was drawn to the display board which

listed Brose as the university indoor mile record holder at 4:12.4. They met personally 45 years

later.

     To introduce a theme or make a point in his book, Blewett pulls quotes from Shakespeare,

Hippocrates, and Beethoven from his creative kit.  “I began writing the book in 2012….it took eleven 

years. When I began to do so, the words flowed rapidly into a 24-chapter explanation of how I learned 

the art and science of middle distance racing, including what I did right and what I did wrong in my  

pursuit of a sub-four mile and how my performance declined in the 35 years.” The book’s preliminary 

title was a leaden The Science of Running Faster.  This writer believes Fifty is nifty.

Near the conclusion of Fifty Years, Blewett tells us:  “In my thirties, I believed that my greatest

failure in life had been not breaking 4 minutes in the mile. My perspective then was all wrong,

however.  Trying to break 4 minutes was an endeavor of which I am now most proud. In failing

to achieve sub -4, I found success. I studied and learned the science and art of runner training

in depth, gave my best effort, and ended my quest with greater knowledge, strength, and will-

power than I would have acquired had I quit running after my lone victory in high school.”

-----------

Editing of this article and others by the author was provided by Tom Coyne of Kalamazoo,

Michigan.


Note from George Brose:

Every time I  go into a bookstore or library, I'm amazed at the number of new books available on the subject of running, fitness, and lifetime training.  Most of it is drivel, filled with a rehash of things most of us, except the absolute neophyte already knows.  This is the book I wish I had had in my hands when I was fourteen years old, twenty years old, thirty years old, fifty years old or any day I was purporting to be a coach of athletes.  William Blewett has taken a lifetime of running, a scientific mind, a gift of introspection, and a sense of humor to put together one of the best non-fiction books on running ever written.  If you want to pass on something of value to your children, grandchildren, friends, and coaches, this is the book.  If you don't believe me, read it first, then decide.

                                           Human Performance Lab, Ball State University 2013
                                                Dr. David L. Costill,  George Brose, Bill Blewett




A+ on this book review.  I found it interesting that Bill Blewett at first thought his greatest failure was not breaking 4:00, only to discover later that the quest was his greatest achievement.  I remember our trip to Ball State and discussing his first book, The Science of the Fastball.
   Today I will pick up The Path Lit by Lightning, Jim Thorpe's book which you recommended.  Bill Schnier

Friday, March 24, 2023

V 13 N. 31 So Has the Transgender Issue Finally Been Settled? Maybe

 World Athletics  (that's Track and Field for most of our readers) has come out with a more definitive (harrumpph!) statement, ruling, position,  theory, belief, that transgender athletes will no longer be eligible to compete if they go through gender modification (is that the correct term?) after they have gone through puberty as a male.  It seems the issue is about boys becoming girls, not the reverse.  In many states in the US this would be illegal for an individual to do, because as minors their parents approving such a medical procedure, assuming they still have the power to decide on their child's healthcare,  would be in violation of local state laws.   All I'm saying is, Parents don't try to do this for your child in Tennessee, Alabama, Texas, and a few other places south of the Mason Dixon Line.  In those states one might want to consider 'conversion therapy'.  Psst!   It don't work, Bubba.

World Athletics is also holding the line on women born with XY chromosomal development aka Difference in Sex Development (DSD) such as Caster Semenya to require them to reduce their levels of testosterone to 2.5 nanomoles per liter of plasma for six months prior to competition or not be allowed to compete in 400 meters to one mile events.  This is what should be called anti-anti doping.  In other words, you have to dope in an anti-doping era to be eligible.  Got it?  It is really difficult to mess with Mother Nature and be fair.  Evolution if you believe in it has really made it difficult to categorize the human species.  And if you don't believe in evolution, then look at is as God's way of adding to the mischief and  confusion.

This seems to be a legitimate step forward, but it does not answer what to do for humans who choose to go through gender modification.  The next step for state, national and international federations is to decide whether they can accommodate a third classification for competition which will ensure fairness for all.  Historically this has not been easy even for allowing women as women to have a place in state, national and international competition.  Artificial roadblocks were constantly thrown in their path, including being potentially damaging to reproductive organs, though I can't see why men should then have been allowed to run over hurdles for the same reason.   Even  allowing women the basic right to vote took many years and lives to win.

Do not expect this to be the end of this debate.  As science learns more about the subject, we will be back at the table in the future trying to figure out what is fair to all.  And of course would it be fair or unfair to rescind Olympic medals of Semenya and a few others?  I would say no, because at the time Semenya won, there was no rule against her being herself.  

I welcome your views on this.

George Brose


Below is Sean Ingle's more erudite explanation of this decision by the World Athletics body which appeared in today's (March 24, 2023) The Guardian International.  


World Athletics has voted to ban transgender women from elite female competitions if they have undergone male puberty, in a decision the governing body said had been taken to “protect the future of the female category”.

Speaking after the ruling, which comes into effect on 31 March, the World Athletics president, Seb Coe, accepted that the decision would be contentious but said his sport had been guided by the “overarching principle” of fairness, as well as the science around physical performance and male advantage.



“Decisions are always difficult when they involve conflicting needs and rights between different groups, but we continue to take the view that we must maintain fairness for female athletes above all other considerations,” he said. “We believe the integrity of the female category in athletics is paramount.”

However Coe also stressed that he would set up a working group that would consult with transgender athletes and review any fresh research that emerged. “We’re not saying no forever,” he said.

Sports have been increasingly wrestling with the thorny issue of transgender participation in recent years, notably when New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard qualified for the Tokyo Olympics in having transitioned in her 30s.

Since Tokyo, the majority of sports have opted to allow trans women to compete if they lower their testosterone to 5 nanomoles per litre for 12 months. However emerging science showing that transgender women retain an advantage in strength, endurance, power, lung capacity – even after suppressing testosterone – had led World Athletics to propose a lower testosterone limit for at least 24 months in January.

However, Coe said there was “little support” for such a policy, with athletes and federations making it clear they wanted to prioritise fairness for female sport over inclusion.

“We entered into a consultation some months ago because we wanted to provoke debate,” he said. “It was really important that we heard from all our stakeholders, including the athletes, the coaches and member federations. And my goodness, we heard from them.”

Athletics becomes the latest sport to ban transgender women from female sport, following World Rugby in 2020 and World Swimming and the Rugby Football League last year. Swimming’s decision came shortly after Lia Thomas, who had been a moderate college swimmer as a male competitor in the United States, won an NCAA national college female title in 2022.

World Athletics’ decision is likely to be opposed by LGBTQ+ groups such as Stonewall. Speaking last month they urged sports to be as inclusive as possible. “The trans population may be small, but they have every right to participate in sports and enjoy the many physical, mental and community benefits of sports,” it said. “The scientific evidence base on trans people in sport is developing but is far from conclusive.”

However the move was welcomed by the campaign group Fair Play For Women. “It is the right thing for women and girls, in line with all the scientific evidence and common sense,” it said. “We now expect to see national federations follow the lead given to them by World Athletics, to restore the talent pathway for girls and young women, and to reinstate fair sport for women of all ages.”

In another significant decision, World Athletics also announced that all athletes with a difference in sex development would be barred from competing internationally in all events unless they reduced their testosterone to 2.5 nanomoles per litre for a minimum of six months.

Until now athletes with a DSD, who include former Olympic women’s champion Caster Semenya and Christine Mboma, the silver medallist in the 200m at the Tokyo Games, have been allowed to compete without medication except in events ranging from 400m to a mile.

However in 2019 the court of arbitration for sport ruled that 46 XY 5-ARD individuals with a difference of sex development, such as Semenya, “enjoy a significant sporting advantage … over 46 XX competitors without such DSD” due to biology.

Coe said that athletes with a DSD would now have to lower their testosterone for at least six months, which means they will miss this summer’s World Championships in Budapest.

“We have been prepared to take these issues head on,” added Coe. “In the past they would have been allowed to drift or be kicked into the long grass. That is not the nature of my leadership and it is certainly not the instincts of my council.”

In another statement, Lord Coe said that Russian athletes would remain barred from track and field “for the foreseeable future” because of the country’s invasion of Ukraine – despite the International Olympic Committee exploring a pathway for Russian and Belarusian athletes.

Tuesday, March 14, 2023

V 13 N. 30 A Letter From Elliott Denman USA Olympic Team 1956


                                                                     Elliott Denman

 We've been putting out so many obituaries of our friends and heroes lately that this letter from Elliott Denman is such a pleasant change.  Mr. Denman reports to us on his sixty years of Millrose Games participation and viewing.   For those who don't remember Elliott Denman, he won a wide range of race walk events in the 1950's including the 3Km and 50Km AAU races in 1959.   He was on the US Olympic Team in Melbourne in 1956 and finished 11th in the 50Km event.  He competed for New York University and the New York Pioneer Club.  After his competitive career he was a journalist for the Asbury Park News and remained very active as an administrator and writer on walking events.


Here are Mr. Denman's memories of the Millrose Games.  We are truly honored to share his report with you.  


                                                         


MY MILLROSE UPDATE:  GIL DODDS 4:05.3 TO YARED NUGUSE 3:47.38.

CLIMBING ALL THOSE STAIRS TO SITTING THIS ONE OUT.    BY ELLIOTT DENMAN.

WEST LONG BRANCH, NJ – First it was a slight fall. Then the Covid. Then a touch of pneumonia.  Then some cardiac distress. Then  a hospital stay and a rehab visit, Then a Pacemaker. Then another hospital stay and another rehab visit.

So folks, it’s been a tough last seven-plus months, all after returning from my 18th trip to the World Track and Field Championships in Eugene.  Yes, this was the 18th Worlds and I’ve been told – subject to ratification, of course – that I’m now the only USA journalist to have covered all 18 of them.  But I may also be the only one of my distinguished press box colleagues to wind up on the injured reserve list after returning home.

Thanks to my wonderful family – dear wife Jo, daughters Sue, Judy and Liz, and grandkids, along

with some great medical folks, though, I am happy to report that I’m on the comeback trail.

Then again, it’s a slow, gradual process and I’m ‘hanging in there,’ as they say, through it all.

So that should explain to those who’ve been asking – and I’ve been told that quite a few have,

which is comforting - hey, where’s Elliott?’ – where I’ve been hanging out, lo, these many months.

Well, where have I been hanging out?  Well, home, mostly.

Other than big family occasions, a goodbye gathering for a distinguished  teammate – Mr. Bob Bazley -  and wife Lisa, (both of them  terrific therapists) who are  moving to Maryland - visits to doctors’

 offices, and occasional rides around town to keep up with noteworthy developments

- buildings going up, buildings going down - in the neighborhood.

But there have been many saving graces.  Lots of good folks visited through my  hospital/rehab stays.

Lots more have e-mailed their best wishes  Many others got on the phone, A whole bunch more resorted to old-time tactics,i.e, the U.S. Postal Service.

So there you have it, and here I am.

Thank the heavens this is the age of immediate-if-not-even sooner, electronic communication.

Thanks to the networks being gracious enough to interrupt their steady diet of chatter/odd-ball

stuff/latest developments in the high-octane world of pro sports, to actually allocate a few precious hours of air time, to give our greatest of Olympic sports an hour or two, every now or then.

I’d been going to the Millrose Games for eons.  My first Milrose days dated back to the Evander High version of me.  Well remembered is scrambling up those endless steps to Madison Square Garden’s upper deck to grab a railing-side view of so many greats of the day cavorting down below. 

Very first of those Millrose days was in February 1948.  It was amazing/stunning/electrifying to see “The Flying Parson,” the Rev. Gil Dodds, crush a quality field – by at least a half-lap, as I remember – to take  the Wanamaker Mile in the world-record time of 4:05.3.  “Wow,” wasn’t good enough for that sizzling 11-lap performance on the Garden’s boards.  Anyone there that night was sure they were seeing the first Olympic 1500-meter champion in a dozen years / or since Jack Lovelock’s epic Berlin win in 1936.

Alas, it didn’t happen.  Never came close. He was injured and out of it by the London-bound  team’s  Olympic Trials.  Then and there, I learned that such are the sometimes heartbreaking days of this sport. 

 By the way, Lovelock and I had Brooklyn ties. But his were the most horrendous possible – toppling off a subway platform.  Mine were far better.  Two of them. My mom was an alumna of Bushwick High.  First date for Jo and I – circa 1960 – took us  to the infamous Coney Island parachute jump.  It scared the heck out of dear Jo and there’s been a mighty fright of heights in her ever since.

 So many other great Millrose memories are still affixed to me, as all the years rolled by.

 The great Wanamaker Milers who followed Gil Dodds:  Don Gehrmann, Fred Wilt, Fred Dwyer, Ron Delany, Josy Barthel, Tom O’Hara, Jim Beatty, Kip Keino, Marty Liquori. Eamonn Coghlan, Marcus O’Sullivan, Noureddine Morceli, Bernard Lagat, Matthew Centrowitz, Oliver Hoare.

The great dashmen: Andy Stanfield,Lindy RemiginoFrank Budd, Sam Perry, Mel Pender, Herb Washington. Houston McTear, Leroy Burrell, Maurice Greene, Andre Cason, Shawn Crawford, Marvin Bracy.

The great hurdlers:  Harrison Dillard, Elias Glbert, Hayes Jones, Willie Davenport, Rod Milburn, Greg Foster, Renaldo “Skeets” Nehmiah, Jack Pierce, Allen Johnson, Terrence Trammell, Devon Allen.

The great 400-600-800-1000 guys:  Mal Whitfield, Reggie Pearman, Roscoe Browne, Tom Courtney, Tom Murphy, Arnie Sowell, Larry James, Byron Dyce, Martin McGrady, Bill Crothers, Rick Wohlhuter, Don Paige, Mark Everett, Johnny Gray, Antonio McKay, Butch Reynolds, Andrew Valmon, Donavan Brazier. The great distance men: Horace Ashenfelter, George Young, Sulemain Nyambui, Said Aouita, Doug Padilla, Reuben Reina. Ryan Hill.  

The great leapers and vaulters:  Bob Richards,John Thomas, Bob Seagren, Valeriy Brumel, Don “Tarzan” Bragg. Sergey Bubka, Dwight Stones, Franklin Jacobs, Jimmy Howard, Milt Goode,  Billy Olson, Carl Lewis, Joni Huntley, Stacy Dragila, Jenn Suhr.

So many of my racewalking comrades: Todd Scully (whose  5:55.8 one-mile performance in 1979, first man to break six for the mile, made him the Roger Bannister of his event), Ray Sharp, Tim Lewis, Curt Clausen, Tim Seaman, Jon Hallman, Nick Christie, Rachel Seaman, Marie Michta-Coffey, Taylor Ewert .

 So many other epic ladies:  Madeline Manning, Wilma Rudolph, Wyomia Tyus, Gwen Torrence, Chandra Cheeseborough, Stephanie Hightower, English Gardner, Cheryl Toussaint,Jan Merrill, Mary Decker Slaney, Jackie Joyner-Kersee, Michelle Freeman, Gail Devers, Doina Melinte, Joetta Clark Dgggs, Maria Mutola, Hazel Clark, Carmen Diane Dixon, Jearl Miles Clark, Carmen  Douma,  Ajee’ Wilson,



And so many more: The mighty shot putters,  high school kids, the relay runners, the masterful Masters.

No longer at “The Garden,”  where crowds in the 17-18,000 vicinity were routine, the Millrose Games moved up town – 135 blocks - to the Armory Track Center in 2012. All the expected  transpired.  Performances were even faster /more dazzling on the Armory’s superb 200-meter track.  As the crowds shrunk by some 70 percent.

But that’s the c’est la vie of indoor track and field these days.  Great meets, great racing, great facilities all over the nation and the globe, great people running the show – at Millrose, Fred Schmertz, Howard and Judy Schmertz, Dr. Norbert Sander, Ray Flynn, Rita Finkel, Jonathan Schindel, Mike Frankfurt and more - and lots of great officials, but far fewer actual witnesses.

Yared Nuguse ( a sensational 3:47.38 Wanamaker Mile), Ryan Crouser, Christian Coleman, Noah Kibet, Chase Ealey, Katie Moon, Aleia Hobbs, Alicia Monson, Laura Muir, Abby Steiner  and- yes, once again, staying unbeaten at the Armory for a an incredible 10th straight year, Ajee’ Wilson - delivered superb performances at the 115th edition of the Millrose Games, but generated far-far less attention.  NYC – which once boasted seven daily newspapers, each with its own track and field “beat writer” - now is down to three. And “The Old Gray Lady” that still erroneously boasts it contains “all the news that’s fit to print,” didn’t bother to cover it at all. At least in the old fashioned way, with full story, often a columnist’s sidebar story, accompanied by complete agate-type full summaries.  But let’s face it – those good old days may never be back.  The sport – sadly but truly, at least in the USA – is beginning to be relegated to the once-every-four-years category by the m- m-m-m-mers (most  major media moguls). Come Olympic year 2024, we’ll be in there with swimming, gymnastics,cycling, maybe rugby sevens.

Fortunately, however, NBC/Peacock gave it two full TV hours on Feb. 11.  Thank you, execs at 30 Rock.

Thank you,  Ato Boldon, Paul Swangard, Sanya Richards-Ross, Kara Goucher,  Lewis Johnson.  You stepped to the plate, took full swings, and got it done..Well, not all of it, as we’d wished, but most of it.  But such is 2023 life in most-major-media-moguls’  fastest lane.

With no thanks to my assortment of difficulties, I had to sit this one out.  But home TV was in excellent working order and  the best of alternatives to actually being at the Armory. The NBC/Peacock crew was back in action one week later at the USA Indoor Nationals in Albuquerque, again a meet I had (a) once competed in, when it was at the Garden, (b) got to cover for years and years and years. And years more.

Now to more current events:  Just wanted to report that I’m making progress. The medical team tells me my vital signs are perking up.  Good wife Jo and family are lending world-class support.  There’s definite hope for better things ahead.  Maybe even getting out of the house and tracking my favorites, live and in person. Someday soon.  Don’t count me out.  As General Douglas MacArthur famously put it.   “I shall return.”  Definitely maybe.  Like the many  50K and 50-mile walks and London-to-Brighton 52.8-mile strolls in my dossier, it’s a clearcut case of one step at a time.  Save me a seat at Millrose 2024.

If you wish to contact Elliott Denman here (with his permission) is how:  

 Elliott Denman

732-222-9213.

V 14 N. 76 Artificial Intelligence Comes to This Blog

 There is a low level AI link that showed up on my computer recently.   It is called Gemini.  I did not even know it was AI until this morni...